Also, the opposite to the above three occurs with a change of the polarity in the constructions’ symmetry and at the greater distance we can observe the constructions strongly attracting each other and when they come closer they strongly repel each other having an air gap unable to unite and at the critical distance where the poles are “like-unlike” simultaneously, they rest in “stable balance”. The state of the art cannot possess “like-unlike” poles simultaneously as a polarity.
Furthermore, the three interactions with their opposites can be constructed with two more interactions and become 5 and if we keep on adding two, they become 7 or 9 or 11 or 13 interactions and even more… New principles in magnetism are introduced
The constructional inventive step of the invention, figures 1, 2, 3 and 4
Figures 1, 2, 3, and 4 show the inventive step of the invention, which is the core and the common application in all applications of the method, and depict the manner by which the invention exploits and makes useful all the polar properties of the loops of the magnetic lines, and each dipole used in the arrangements, in one or the other way, makes use of this inventive step of the construction.
- fig. 1.jpg (86.97 KiB) Viewed 5031 times
Figure 1 shows every specific in magnetic vector and direction part of the loop (8) of a dipole (7), in the front bundle of dynamic lines (3), two poles corresponding to every two loops, which poles regard the two poles (1, 2) of the dipole (7) and also in front/rear bundle of dynamic lines (4), which is in the neutral zone of the magnet (5), where there two other beneficial poles are present, which correspond to each bundle of loops of the neutral zone (8, 5) and are of opposite polarity from their respective adjacent front poles of the same loop. The term “beneficial pole” is used in the sense that in the interactions of the applications of the invention it functions in the same way and with the same properties as a conventional pole with two loops. In every planar theorized surface (6) that cuts vertically every loop of the magnetic lines, exactly at the points where the magnetic lines curve leaving every polar area (3) and are located in the named neutral zone (5) of the magnet, every magnetic line has an opposite vector and direction from what each one had at its neighboring polar area (3). All lines at that planar theorized surface (6) that cuts there vertically the magnetic lines are of opposite polarity from the neighboring pole (3) they belong. We name then, these dynamic lines, specifically for their recognizable identification as front/rear bundle of dynamic lines (4). This bundle is also in that area (6) always of opposite polarity than the adjacent pole (3), in which these are also present and differ from this part of the dynamic lines coming from the adjacent polar region (3) and which for their recognizable identification are particularly designated as front bundle of dynamic lines (3). At the north (1) pole (3) of a dipole (7), which is designated as front bundle of dynamic lines (3), the adjacent front/rear bundle of dynamic lines (4) coming from a perpendicularly considered level (6) jointly from the two adjacent loops (8) (8) of the neutral zone (5) are of south polarity (2) and this as (4, 2) is identical to the south (2) pole (3) of the dipole (7). The respective applies to the south (2) pole (3) of the same dipole (7), which is also designated as front bundle of dynamic lines (3) and the adjacent front/rear bundle of dynamic lines (4), which comes from a vertically considered level (6) jointly from the two adjacent loops (8) (8) of the neutral zone (5) is of north (1) polarity (4,1) and is identical to the north (1) pole (3) of the dipole (7). Because then of the fact that every dipole (7) has two poles (3, 1 and 3, 2) the invention exploits construction wise the areas (5) of every loop (8) of every dipole (7), utilizing the differentiation that the dynamic lines attain in their magnetic vector and direction in space, when they penetrate in the neutral zone (5) of the magnet (7) so that every dipole (7) has two poles (3, 1 and 3, 2) but every loop (8) of the dipole (7) possesses two more beneficially exploited construction wise polarities (4, 1) and (4, 2).
- fig. 2.jpg (96.33 KiB) Viewed 5031 times
Figure 2 shows a second case, wherein due to the nature of magnetism and since the dynamic lines always select the closest and easiest way or means to pass through both magnetic materials that are nearby to close a magnetic loop (8A) as dynamic lines, these corresponding results are achieved by positioning a dipole (9) in marginal adjacent rear position from a front dipole (7), where the front pole of the rear dipole (9) is of the same polarity, meaning north (1) with the rear polarity of the front dipole (7) and one front bundle of the dynamic lines (8A) of the rear dipole (9), unifies with the bundle of dynamic lines of the loop of the front dipole (7) so that a single and uniform loop of magnetic lines (8A) is formed that penetrates both dipoles (7, 9). If the front bundle of dynamic lines (3, 2) is designated as the one coming from the front dipole (7), then the total front bundle of the rear dipole (9) will be designated as front/rear bundle of dynamic lines (4A, 1), executing the similar operations as in the first case of figure 1 (4, 1), referred to above as one dipole (7) only, with the exception that the front/rear bundle (4A, 1) is emitted from the front bundle of dynamic lines of the rear positioned dipole (9). The front/rear bundle of dynamic lines (4), of any polarity, is emitted spherically in the three-dimensional space from a cylindrical dipole and thus, as long as the application exploits this property of the dipoles, this property will be present also in cases not mentioned in the description and the figures. However, its property will not be mentioned for clarity reasons, when this will always have secondary role and not primary, whereas when it has a primary role, it should always be referred to in the text and the drawings.
- fig. 3.jpg (120.32 KiB) Viewed 5031 times
Figure 3 shows the front/rear bundle of dynamic lines (4A, 1) being formed from two front dipoles (7) and one rear dipole (9), where there are two loops (8A) (8A) passing through the two front dipoles (7) and the rear dipole (9). Thus, there are various combinations, wherein loops of the type (8A), passing through two magnetic dipoles, may be present. In the case of three front dipoles (7) and a rear dipole (9), three loops (8A) etc. will be formed and the maximum number is six loops (8A), between equally sized proper cyclic cylindrical magnetic dipoles, namely when there are six front dipoles (7) in the front and around a rear dipole (9), with p6m symmetry, of hexagonal planar mesh of plane tiling, as shown exemplarily in figure 4. Figure 3 and the above referred as in figure 4 is exemplary, since (4A) may contain two, or three or up to six loops (8A), which will depend on how the magnetic dipoles are arranged in the construction of each magnetic arrangement.
The exploitation of all the polar properties produced by the dynamic lines of the loops of the magnetic lines of a dipole, either by the manner of figure 1, or by the manner of figures 2, 3 or 4 constitutes the constructional inventive step of all the arrangements of the invention. In any of the mentioned arrangements, where one arrangement is opposite to the other, the above-mentioned exploitation of the various cases of figure 1 and of the figures 2, 3 and 4 is used, wherein the front/rear bundle of dynamic lines, of figure 1 (4), is exactly similar in operation as the front/rear bundle of dynamic lines of figure 2, 3 and 4 (4A). Their only difference is in the intensity, namely in figures 2, 3 and 4, the (4A) is more powerful in magnetic intensity than that of figure 1 (4). As regards the functions of the interactions, these are similar.
- fig. 4.jpg (106.61 KiB) Viewed 5031 times
The first multiple interactions arrangement of the invention is the three interactions vs. the either one known of the state of the art. This occurs as follows:
A certain plurality of dipolar magnets arranged in specific positions is placed by gluing on a thin planar surface, thereby comprising a magnetic arrangement. Each magnetic arrangement is perpendicularly supported on a thin, planar, horizontal and non-magnetic base, thereby making a “magnetic construction”. This magnetic construction slides in the grooves of a guide and interacts with its respective magnetic construction with which it constitutes a pair. The motion of the pair of the magnetic constructions on the guide is controlled manually. The guide allows the two magnetic constructions to interact in an attractive or repulsive manner and even to balance unmoving, remaining stable, however, this is always achieved only towards one of the magnetic constructions remain always confronted and parallel to each other. The guide with the two magnetic constructions, which interact thereon constitute the magnetic apparatus, which is the product of the invention. The user of the product moves forward or/and backwards the confronted magnetic constructions in various ways as desired. Each innovational symmetrical arrangement of the dipolar magnets creates new technological distributions of the magnetic lines, which in both manners regarding their path through the magnets and also regarding their distribution in the surrounding air space as dynamic lines determine the geometry of their magneto static field. In the state of the art, the poles confronted in-between interacting magnetic constructions are only like or only unlike independently of the opening or closing fluctuation of the distance intervening between the poles.
In the operation of the present application the poles in-between interacting magnetic constructions of the invention become like, unlike, like-unlike and unlike-like depending on the opening or closing fluctuation of the distance intervening between the poles. The main characteristic features of properties possession and production of interactions and phenomena in the technological application of the invention lies in the uniqueness that on guide there exist three first-time emerged different delimitated phenomena of magnetic interdependences, namely three first-time emerged different multi-planar polarities in-between two magnetic bodies, which create correspondingly three emerged different interactions with also three first-time emerged different fields. All these new interdependences are produced in the opening or closing fluctuation of the distance that is regulated within the one and only empty air space when two magnetic constructions become confronted. More analytically:
Experimental Section, Materials and Methods
1) Depending on the position and the distance of the magnetic constructions, their magnetic poles become in the nearer distance unlike producing attractive in effect field and in the further distance become like producing repulsive in effect field, while in the mid-distance become unlike and like simultaneously where namely because of the intensity equivalence of the attractive and repulsive forces a production of unstable balance interaction occurs. The front poles have to be like.
2) In the case where we bring together two other, differently configured types of confronted magnetic constructions, then, depending on the position and the distance of the magnetic constructions, their magnetic poles become in the nearer distance like producing repulsive in effect field and in the further distance become unlike producing an attractive in effect field, while in the middle distance become like and unlike simultaneously where namely because of the intensity equivalence of the repulsive and attractive forces a production of stable balance interaction occurs (secured attractive field of no-contact from a distance). The front poles have to be unlike.
For the above arrangement we have 3 + 3 = 6 magnetic interactions in total vs. the known 2 of the state of the art. For both 1) and 2) as described above, see Fig’s 5, 6 and 9.
- fig. 5.jpg (116.33 KiB) Viewed 5031 times
- fig. 6.jpg (105.52 KiB) Viewed 5031 times
- fig. 7.jpg (108.48 KiB) Viewed 5031 times
- fig. 8.jpg (118.36 KiB) Viewed 5031 times
- fig. 9.jpg (43.06 KiB) Viewed 5031 times
- fig. 10.jpg (44.07 KiB) Viewed 5031 times
All different interactions in each of the two above cases are three; however, there are additional other functions of the magnetic apparatus, which introduce in 1) and 2) case respectively, two further first-time emerged interactions. For each of these cases there evolve five first-time emerged different interactions in the empty air space between two magnetic constructions.
For this above arrangement then, we will have 5 + 5 = 10 magnetic interactions in total vs. the known 2 of the state of the art. See Fig’s 7, 8 and 10.
Accordingly, as 2 interactions were added to the three to make 5 interactions, the invention evolves its symmetrical arrangements in a continuous innovative process and keeps on adding 2 interactions to the 5, to make 7 and continues to add 2 interactions to the 7, to make 9 and in the same manner makes 11 and 13 and even more…